Keep 3DLuVr online!
3DLuVr Logo
Sections
Articles
 From the Real World
 Digital Painting Series
 Featuring of...
 On the Bookshelf
Tutorials
 3ds max
 LightWave3D
 Softimage XSI
 Rhinoceros 3D
 Video Tutorials
FunZone menu
 I always wanted to be
 Talk to an employer
 Why Ask "Why"
TechZone menu
 Hardware Reviews
 Software Reviews
 Benchmarking
 Q&A, Tips & Tricks
UserZone menu
 The Artist Sites
 15 Min of Fame
 Request an Account
 Current Assignment
 Sponsors & Prizes
 Make a Submission
 Voting Booth
 Competition Rules
About menu
 Mission Statement
 Policies
 Advertising
 Comments
 Poll Archive
 Links
 How to IRC
 Donations
Login
Log in to be able to post comments to the news items, forum posts, and other facilities.
Username: 
 
Password: 
Not registered? Register!     Lost Password?
Poll
 Your New Year`s Resolution is...
Gain employment
Stop smoking/drinking/etc
Get back in shape
Find the meaning of life
Conquer the World
Absolutely nothing

    Poll Results
Comments
Want to leave us a comment about the site or in general? Click here to access the form.
TechZone Heading
Workstation Smackdown (Nvidia Quadro DCC review)
Added on: Mon Feb 04 2002
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 

Conclusions and Other Misc Thoughts, Babbles, and Ramblings

Well you’ve seen the data. Over 768 Benchmarks (Each test was run four times as explained in the benchmark article), 45 graphs, and a ridiculous number of images.
Of maybe you didn’t. Maybe you skipped to the last page to just get a single graph or conclusion, and skipped the whole article to see what my final point is.

Well since I know that many of you are going to do this, I’ve taken the liberty of creating a Master Time and Master FPS graph, showcasing the average time to complete (Less = better) and the average frames per second (more = fantastic) of each card across all the tests run. Remember if you want to see individual tests and explanations, you’ll actually have to read the article.


Quadro DCC vs ALL Master Time and Frames Per Second

Would you look at that, statistics actually work! The DCC comes out on top by a long shot, Maxextreme and Nvidia’s powerful accelerator decimate the lesser gaming cards. However these cheaper solutions can not be bypassed, due to the fact they’re still very powerful performers.

This article set out to do a few important things. The first of which, to demonstrate an accurate, repeatable, reproducible, real world benchmark for 3dsmax4 for the purposes of testing a variety of accelerators. The second, to demonstrate why this type of testing was done, which in turn should shed light into other testing practices of other sites. And finally, to see how the DCC and other Nvidia cards perform within 3dsmax 4.

As seen throughout the discussion and the data presented, the Quadro DCC is a powerful performer for 3dsmax. It combines a strong feature set with powerful performance and Nvidia’s legendary drivers. It provides for future design within applications by featuring programmable pixel/vertex shaders, which though available now, (Max4, Maya4, XSI 2.0 will only become more refined in the future. All of this power and expandability come at what some would consider pennies.
The Quadro DCC can be found on the web for around $670.00 USD, one of the cheapest workstation solutions currently on the market.

Because of its features, support, and cost, I give the Quadro DCC my highest recommendation for a 3dsmax workstation card. There is no better solution for the price.

I’d like to thank Brian Burke from Nvidia for giving me a chance to review this card, and make this information available to the public CGI community.
I apologize for the delay in getting this article out, but I believe it was well worth the wait. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to email me.
 
© 1997-2017 3DLuVrTM (Three Dee Lover)
Best viewed in 1024x768 or higher,
using any modern CSS compliant browser.