Keep 3DLuVr online!
3DLuVr Logo
 From the Real World
 Digital Painting Series
 Featuring of...
 On the Bookshelf
 3ds max
 Softimage XSI
 Rhinoceros 3D
 Video Tutorials
FunZone menu
 I always wanted to be
 Talk to an employer
 Why Ask "Why"
TechZone menu
 Hardware Reviews
 Software Reviews
 Q&A, Tips & Tricks
UserZone menu
 The Artist Sites
 15 Min of Fame
 Request an Account
 Current Assignment
 Sponsors & Prizes
 Make a Submission
 Voting Booth
 Competition Rules
About menu
 Mission Statement
 Poll Archive
 How to IRC
Log in to be able to post comments to the news items, forum posts, and other facilities.
Not registered? Register!     Lost Password?
 Your New Year`s Resolution is...
Gain employment
Stop smoking/drinking/etc
Get back in shape
Find the meaning of life
Conquer the World
Absolutely nothing

    Poll Results
Want to leave us a comment about the site or in general? Click here to access the form.
TechZone Heading
Workstation Smackdown (Nvidia Quadro DCC review)
Added on: Mon Feb 04 2002
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 

WireFrame1 (1600x1200x32 300 Frames)

Wireframe. Heidi�s playground. Without optimized drivers and a unified backbuffer most of the nvidia cards can�t outdo Software Heidi. Then they�re the DCC, pimpin out a 3x performance lead. Workstation power at a budget price..gotta love it.

WireFrame2 (1600x1200x32 300 Frames)

History repeats itself, with the DCC keeping a sizable lead over the rest of the cards. Wireframe performance is very important to modelers, and this is just one of the many situations where putting down some extra $ really makes the difference.

Well now you know the performance of these accelerators within 3dsmax. It's quite obvious that the DCC is the overall winner.
But by how much? And how is the DCC effected by different settings, resolutions, and color depths? Well read on some more and you�ll find out =).

� 1997-2024 3DLuVrTM (Three Dee Lover)
Best viewed in 1024x768 or higher,
using any modern CSS compliant browser.